H200 NVL vs H100 NVL: when the upgrade pays off
Eurokommerz, Vienna, since 2006: Private AI/ML · IT Managed Services · Enterprise Training · AI Hardware & Software
- Compute specs are identical at every precision, from FP64 to INT8
- H200 NVL carries 1.5× the memory (141 vs 94 GB) and 1.22× the bandwidth (4,813 vs 3,938 GB/s)
- Measured gains on SXM systems range from 0% to 3.4×: none on short context in BF16, 3.4× on 32K-token inputs (Baseten, eight H200 against eight H100)
- In its MLPerf® Inference v4.0 submissions of March 2024, NVIDIA reported up to 28% more Llama 2 70B throughput for the H200 SXM than for the H100 SXM at equal 700 W (unverified, not reviewed by MLCommons Association)
- H200 NVL bridges up to four cards (564 GB); H100 NVL only two (188 GB)
Supplied by Eurokommerz: NVIDIA H200 NVL Check price and availability →
Compute specifications are identical
The H200 NVL and the H100 NVL have the same compute figures; they differ in memory (141 GB of HBM3e against 94 GB of HBM3), bandwidth (4.8 against 3.9 TB/s), power limit (up to 600 W against 400 W) and NVLink, which joins up to four H200 NVL but only two H100 NVL. Side by side, the compute sections of the two spec sheets match to the last digit. We supply the H200 NVL and the NVLink bridges it needs; tell us your model and context length, and our team will help you judge whether the upgrade pays off.
| PRECISION | H200 NVL | H100 NVL |
|---|---|---|
| FP64 | 30 TFLOPS | 30 TFLOPS |
| FP32 | 60 TFLOPS | 60 TFLOPS |
| TF32 Tensor Core | 835 TFLOPS | 835 TFLOPS |
| BF16 / FP16 Tensor Core | 1,671 TFLOPS | 1,671 TFLOPS |
| FP8 / INT8 Tensor Core | 3,341 TFLOPS | 3,341 TFLOPS |
| Boost clock | 1,785 MHz | 1,785 MHz |
Tensor figures with structured sparsity, per NVIDIA’s own footnotes
For a compute-bound task, the two cards therefore perform the same on paper. Under sustained load, however, the older card can clock down earlier, because the H100 NVL defaults to a 400 W cap and the H200 NVL to 600 W. The identical peak figures come from the spec sheets, and we found no measurement of sustained clocks on the two cards. That said, NVIDIA’s technical blog on its MLPerf® Inference v4.0 results of March 2024 states that after TensorRT-LLM optimisations, Llama 2 70B on H200 is limited by compute, not memory bandwidth.
Memory: 141 GB HBM3e against 94 GB HBM3
| PARAMETER | H200 NVL | H100 NVL |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 141 GB | 94 GB |
| Type | HBM3e | HBM3 |
| Bandwidth | 4,813 GB/s | 3,938 GB/s |
| Memory clock | 3,201 MHz | 2,619 MHz |
| Bus width | 6,016-bit | 6,016-bit |
| MIG profiles | up to 7 × 1g.18gb (16.5 GB each) | up to 7 × 1g.12gb |
Both NVL cards run a wider bus than the H100 SXM: six HBM stacks instead of five, so even the older H100 NVL delivers 3.9 TB/s against 3.35 on SXM. We found no NVIDIA explanation of why the capacity is 94 GB rather than a round 96.
Published gains by workload
The gain ranges from zero to 3.4×, depending on how memory-bound the task is.
| SCENARIO | GAIN | WHO MEASURED |
|---|---|---|
| Short context, 128 tokens, BF16 | ~0% | Baseten |
| Same in FP8 | +11% | Baseten |
| Batch 4096, FP8 | +36% | Baseten |
| Batch 4096, BF16 | +47% | Baseten |
| HPC application suite (NVL claim) | up to 1.3× | NVIDIA |
| 32,768-token input, batch 64 | 3.4× | Baseten |
Baseten measured SXM cards (8×H200 vs 8×H100, 700 W); the NVL cards run 600 W against 400 W, so treat the ratios as indicative.
NVIDIA published a separate figure from its own MLPerf® Inference v4.0 submissions of March 2024: at the same 700 W, the H200 SXM delivered up to 28% more Llama 2 70B throughput than the H100 SXM (unverified). It is NVIDIA’s figure for the SXM cards and does not compare with Baseten’s measurements. Neither 2026 round, MLPerf® Inference v6.0 or v6.1, has results for both NVL cards in the same benchmark, so neither gives a like-for-like comparison. Result not verified by MLCommons Association. The MLPerf name and logo are registered and unregistered trademarks of MLCommons Association in the United States and other countries. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use strictly prohibited. See www.mlcommons.org for more information.
Baseten concludes that outside these situations, H200 gives a minimal gain over H100, and that many inference workloads are more cost-effective on H100. For the NVL pair NVIDIA quotes up to 1.7× on language models and 1.3× on HPC; we found no published test conditions for these figures.
NVIDIA’s headline figures and their footnotes
The largest figure in the H200 materials is “110× on HPC”. According to the footnote, it compares four GPUs with two Sapphire Rapids 8480 CPUs, so the comparison is with processors, not with the H100.
The second figure is 1.9× on Llama 2 70B. NVIDIA’s footnote gives the conditions: H100 ran batch 8 and H200 ran batch 32. The larger batch is possible because of the extra memory (see the KV-cache arithmetic), which is the point of the H200. It does not mean that the same workload runs twice as fast: if your model already fits in 94 GB with the batch you need, that gain will not appear.
NVLink: the biggest generational difference
| PARAMETER | H200 NVL | H100 NVL |
|---|---|---|
| Cards per NVLink bridge | up to 4 | only 2 |
| Memory across the bridge | 564 GB | 188 GB |
| NVLink bandwidth | 900 GB/s | 600 GB/s |
| Bridges per card | 1 wide (separate SKUs for 2- and 4-card) | 3 narrow, same as A100 PCIe |
Bridges of the two generations are not interchangeable
The rated 900 GB/s counts both directions: 18 links at 25 GB/s per direction, 450 GB/s one-way. A user report of a two-card H200 NVL setup in an HPE DL385 Gen11 shows all 18 links active, reported by nvidia-smi at a raw rate of 26.6 GB/s per link. Cards outside an NVLink bridge talk over PCIe Gen5 at 128 GB/s, roughly seven times slower.
Power, temperature, driver and licence
| PARAMETER | H200 NVL | H100 NVL |
|---|---|---|
| Default power | 600 W | 400 W |
| Operating ambient | 10 to 45 °C | 0 to 50 °C |
| Minimum driver | R565 TRD1; NVIDIA’s brief adds CUDA 12.7, the CUDA version of that driver (no 12.7 toolkit exists; toolkits from 11.8 support Hopper) | R535, CUDA 12.2 |
| UEFI | supported | not supported |
| NVIDIA AI Enterprise | 5 years included | 5 years included |
The first two rows matter for planning. The newer card’s default power limit is 200 W higher, and its rated ambient range is narrower at both ends. The server’s limit is the tighter one, because the servers certified for the H200 NVL cap the room at 30 or 35 °C, as our checklist for existing servers shows. At full load all year, the extra 200 W add up to 1,752 kWh per card, and the rack power budget becomes a constraint before the energy cost does. The driver row gives first-support versions only: R535 reached end of life in June 2026, so both cards belong on a current branch, R580 with long-term support to June 2028 or R595 to March 2027.
When the upgrade pays, and when an existing H100 NVL is enough
An upgrade pays when the gain on your workload profile outweighs the difference in cost per useful token; the cost side can only be calculated from a quote for your configuration. In Baseten’s tests on SXM systems a chat workload with short prompts gained about 11% in FP8, while 32K-token inputs gained 3.4×.
It matters even more to compare whole configurations rather than single cards, as the table below does.
According to a reseller’s end-of-life notice, the last time buy for the H100 NVL was 1 November 2025. The comparison below is for servers that already run H100 NVL cards.
| MEMORY NEEDED (MODEL + KV CACHE) | WHAT IT MEANS IN PRACTICE |
|---|---|
| up to 94 GB | an H100 NVL you already run is enough: the H200 NVL buys memory you will not use |
| 94 to 141 GB | one H200 NVL, or an existing bridged H100 NVL pair. One dual-slot card instead of two, 600 W instead of 800 |
| 141 to 188 GB | an existing bridged H100 NVL pair gives 188 GB |
| over 188 GB | H200 NVL for one NVLink domain: a pair gives 282 GB, a quad 564 GB. H100 NVL bridges join two cards at most; beyond a pair, the model spans PCIe |
Where the table points to the H200 NVL, we supply it with the two-way or four-way NVLink bridge. Write to us with the machine type of your current servers, and we check their power and airflow before you order.
For spiky, one-off workloads, the cloud is the better choice. Both NVL cards, however, ship with a five-year NVIDIA AI Enterprise subscription (an add-on for SXM boards outside NVIDIA’s DGX systems), and on your own servers your data stays in your network. In medical, financial and public-sector projects this is often a precondition, settled before cost is discussed.
What we supply
For an upgrade from H100 NVL, we supply the NVIDIA H200 NVL (141 GB HBM3e, PCIe) with the new NVLink bridges it needs, on one EU contract and invoice with manufacturer warranty. Where 96 GB of GDDR7 per card is enough and no H100 NVL estate has to be matched, we supply the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition and build servers to order with it, among them the inference node with four cards and 384 GB in our AI server configurations; it has no NVLink, so a model split across its cards communicates over PCIe. We do not supply the H100 NVL.
FAQ
What is the difference between the H200 NVL and the H100 NVL?
Does the H100 NVL work as a single 94 GB card, without a bridge?
Will an H100 NVL bridge fit the H200 NVL?
Does vGPU via mdev work on the H200?
Do two servers with H200 NVL need an InfiniBand switch?
Does NVLink work inside a virtual machine?
We supply the H200 NVL with the NVLink bridges it needs, and the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition in AI servers built to order. Describe your task in a few lines and our team will help: we reply within one business day.
Talk to an expertWe reply within one business day