BLOG · COMPARISON · · UPDATED

H200 NVL vs H100 NVL: when the upgrade pays off

Eurokommerz, Vienna, since 2006: Private AI/ML · IT Managed Services · Enterprise Training · AI Hardware & Software

IN BRIEF
  • Compute specs are identical at every precision, from FP64 to INT8
  • H200 NVL carries 1.5× the memory (141 vs 94 GB) and 1.22× the bandwidth (4,813 vs 3,938 GB/s)
  • Measured gains on SXM systems range from 0% to 3.4×: none on short context in BF16, 3.4× on 32K-token inputs (Baseten, eight H200 against eight H100)
  • In its MLPerf® Inference v4.0 submissions of March 2024, NVIDIA reported up to 28% more Llama 2 70B throughput for the H200 SXM than for the H100 SXM at equal 700 W (unverified, not reviewed by MLCommons Association)
  • H200 NVL bridges up to four cards (564 GB); H100 NVL only two (188 GB)

Supplied by Eurokommerz: NVIDIA H200 NVL  Check price and availability →

Compute specifications are identical

The H200 NVL and the H100 NVL have the same compute figures; they differ in memory (141 GB of HBM3e against 94 GB of HBM3), bandwidth (4.8 against 3.9 TB/s), power limit (up to 600 W against 400 W) and NVLink, which joins up to four H200 NVL but only two H100 NVL. Side by side, the compute sections of the two spec sheets match to the last digit. We supply the H200 NVL and the NVLink bridges it needs; tell us your model and context length, and our team will help you judge whether the upgrade pays off.

PRECISIONH200 NVLH100 NVL
FP6430 TFLOPS30 TFLOPS
FP3260 TFLOPS60 TFLOPS
TF32 Tensor Core835 TFLOPS835 TFLOPS
BF16 / FP16 Tensor Core1,671 TFLOPS1,671 TFLOPS
FP8 / INT8 Tensor Core3,341 TFLOPS3,341 TFLOPS
Boost clock1,785 MHz1,785 MHz

Tensor figures with structured sparsity, per NVIDIA’s own footnotes

For a compute-bound task, the two cards therefore perform the same on paper. Under sustained load, however, the older card can clock down earlier, because the H100 NVL defaults to a 400 W cap and the H200 NVL to 600 W. The identical peak figures come from the spec sheets, and we found no measurement of sustained clocks on the two cards. That said, NVIDIA’s technical blog on its MLPerf® Inference v4.0 results of March 2024 states that after TensorRT-LLM optimisations, Llama 2 70B on H200 is limited by compute, not memory bandwidth.

Memory: 141 GB HBM3e against 94 GB HBM3

PARAMETERH200 NVLH100 NVL
Capacity141 GB94 GB
TypeHBM3eHBM3
Bandwidth4,813 GB/s3,938 GB/s
Memory clock3,201 MHz2,619 MHz
Bus width6,016-bit6,016-bit
MIG profilesup to 7 × 1g.18gb (16.5 GB each)up to 7 × 1g.12gb

Both NVL cards run a wider bus than the H100 SXM: six HBM stacks instead of five, so even the older H100 NVL delivers 3.9 TB/s against 3.35 on SXM. We found no NVIDIA explanation of why the capacity is 94 GB rather than a round 96.

Published gains by workload

The gain ranges from zero to 3.4×, depending on how memory-bound the task is.

SCENARIOGAINWHO MEASURED
Short context, 128 tokens, BF16~0%Baseten
Same in FP8+11%Baseten
Batch 4096, FP8+36%Baseten
Batch 4096, BF16+47%Baseten
HPC application suite (NVL claim)up to 1.3×NVIDIA
32,768-token input, batch 643.4×Baseten

Baseten measured SXM cards (8×H200 vs 8×H100, 700 W); the NVL cards run 600 W against 400 W, so treat the ratios as indicative.

NVIDIA published a separate figure from its own MLPerf® Inference v4.0 submissions of March 2024: at the same 700 W, the H200 SXM delivered up to 28% more Llama 2 70B throughput than the H100 SXM (unverified). It is NVIDIA’s figure for the SXM cards and does not compare with Baseten’s measurements. Neither 2026 round, MLPerf® Inference v6.0 or v6.1, has results for both NVL cards in the same benchmark, so neither gives a like-for-like comparison. Result not verified by MLCommons Association. The MLPerf name and logo are registered and unregistered trademarks of MLCommons Association in the United States and other countries. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use strictly prohibited. See www.mlcommons.org for more information.

Baseten concludes that outside these situations, H200 gives a minimal gain over H100, and that many inference workloads are more cost-effective on H100. For the NVL pair NVIDIA quotes up to 1.7× on language models and 1.3× on HPC; we found no published test conditions for these figures.

NVIDIA’s headline figures and their footnotes

The largest figure in the H200 materials is “110× on HPC”. According to the footnote, it compares four GPUs with two Sapphire Rapids 8480 CPUs, so the comparison is with processors, not with the H100.

The second figure is 1.9× on Llama 2 70B. NVIDIA’s footnote gives the conditions: H100 ran batch 8 and H200 ran batch 32. The larger batch is possible because of the extra memory (see the KV-cache arithmetic), which is the point of the H200. It does not mean that the same workload runs twice as fast: if your model already fits in 94 GB with the batch you need, that gain will not appear.

NVLink: the biggest generational difference

PARAMETERH200 NVLH100 NVL
Cards per NVLink bridgeup to 4only 2
Memory across the bridge564 GB188 GB
NVLink bandwidth900 GB/s600 GB/s
Bridges per card1 wide (separate SKUs for 2- and 4-card)3 narrow, same as A100 PCIe

Bridges of the two generations are not interchangeable

The rated 900 GB/s counts both directions: 18 links at 25 GB/s per direction, 450 GB/s one-way. A user report of a two-card H200 NVL setup in an HPE DL385 Gen11 shows all 18 links active, reported by nvidia-smi at a raw rate of 26.6 GB/s per link. Cards outside an NVLink bridge talk over PCIe Gen5 at 128 GB/s, roughly seven times slower.

Power, temperature, driver and licence

PARAMETERH200 NVLH100 NVL
Default power600 W400 W
Operating ambient10 to 45 °C0 to 50 °C
Minimum driverR565 TRD1; NVIDIA’s brief adds CUDA 12.7, the CUDA version of that driver (no 12.7 toolkit exists; toolkits from 11.8 support Hopper)R535, CUDA 12.2
UEFIsupportednot supported
NVIDIA AI Enterprise5 years included5 years included

The first two rows matter for planning. The newer card’s default power limit is 200 W higher, and its rated ambient range is narrower at both ends. The server’s limit is the tighter one, because the servers certified for the H200 NVL cap the room at 30 or 35 °C, as our checklist for existing servers shows. At full load all year, the extra 200 W add up to 1,752 kWh per card, and the rack power budget becomes a constraint before the energy cost does. The driver row gives first-support versions only: R535 reached end of life in June 2026, so both cards belong on a current branch, R580 with long-term support to June 2028 or R595 to March 2027.

When the upgrade pays, and when an existing H100 NVL is enough

An upgrade pays when the gain on your workload profile outweighs the difference in cost per useful token; the cost side can only be calculated from a quote for your configuration. In Baseten’s tests on SXM systems a chat workload with short prompts gained about 11% in FP8, while 32K-token inputs gained 3.4×.

It matters even more to compare whole configurations rather than single cards, as the table below does.

According to a reseller’s end-of-life notice, the last time buy for the H100 NVL was 1 November 2025. The comparison below is for servers that already run H100 NVL cards.

MEMORY NEEDED (MODEL + KV CACHE)WHAT IT MEANS IN PRACTICE
up to 94 GBan H100 NVL you already run is enough: the H200 NVL buys memory you will not use
94 to 141 GBone H200 NVL, or an existing bridged H100 NVL pair. One dual-slot card instead of two, 600 W instead of 800
141 to 188 GBan existing bridged H100 NVL pair gives 188 GB
over 188 GBH200 NVL for one NVLink domain: a pair gives 282 GB, a quad 564 GB. H100 NVL bridges join two cards at most; beyond a pair, the model spans PCIe

Where the table points to the H200 NVL, we supply it with the two-way or four-way NVLink bridge. Write to us with the machine type of your current servers, and we check their power and airflow before you order.

For spiky, one-off workloads, the cloud is the better choice. Both NVL cards, however, ship with a five-year NVIDIA AI Enterprise subscription (an add-on for SXM boards outside NVIDIA’s DGX systems), and on your own servers your data stays in your network. In medical, financial and public-sector projects this is often a precondition, settled before cost is discussed.

What we supply

For an upgrade from H100 NVL, we supply the NVIDIA H200 NVL (141 GB HBM3e, PCIe) with the new NVLink bridges it needs, on one EU contract and invoice with manufacturer warranty. Where 96 GB of GDDR7 per card is enough and no H100 NVL estate has to be matched, we supply the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition and build servers to order with it, among them the inference node with four cards and 384 GB in our AI server configurations; it has no NVLink, so a model split across its cards communicates over PCIe. We do not supply the H100 NVL.

FAQ

What is the difference between the H200 NVL and the H100 NVL?
The compute figures are the same at every precision, and the H200 NVL differs in memory: 141 GB of HBM3e at 4.8 TB/s against 94 GB of HBM3 at 3.9 TB/s. Its power limit is configurable up to 600 W, against 350 to 400 W on the H100 NVL, and its NVLink bridge joins up to four cards instead of two. Both split into up to seven MIG instances, 16.5 GB each on the H200 NVL and 12 GB on the H100 NVL.
Does the H100 NVL work as a single 94 GB card, without a bridge?
Yes. The question comes up often because the card was long shown only in 188 GB pairs, and ServeTheHome published a separate clarification.
Will an H100 NVL bridge fit the H200 NVL?
No. H100 NVL uses three narrow bridges (same as A100 PCIe); H200 NVL uses one wide bridge of a new type with separate SKUs for two-card and four-card sets. Plan new bridges when upgrading the fleet.
Does vGPU via mdev work on the H200?
Not the way it did on older cards. On Ampere and later data-centre GPUs, vGPUs sit on SR-IOV virtual functions that have to be enabled first, for example with NVIDIA’s sriov-manage, so a host without them shows no vGPU types. On Proxmox VE, licensing is the obstacle. Proxmox has been a supported NVIDIA vGPU platform since vGPU 18, but its documentation (August 2026) says NVIDIA AI Enterprise, which H200 vGPU requires, is not officially supported there. NVIDIA AI Enterprise documentation lists the H200 NVL vGPU types; NVIDIA’s vGPU support matrix for VMware vSphere does not list the card as of October 2026, so confirm hypervisor support with NVIDIA before you plan vGPU on it.
Do two servers with H200 NVL need an InfiniBand switch?
No. NVIDIA’s answer on its forum is to connect the ConnectX-7 adapters back-to-back. Check the NUMA layout as well: if the GPU and the NIC sit in different nodes, traffic routes through the CPU.
Does NVLink work inside a virtual machine?
A user report describes two H200 NVL in an HPE DL385 Gen11 with Proxmox VE 8.4, VFIO passthrough and an Ubuntu guest, with all 18 links active inside the VM. It worked, but outside any configuration NVIDIA lists as supported.

We supply the H200 NVL with the NVLink bridges it needs, and the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition in AI servers built to order. Describe your task in a few lines and our team will help: we reply within one business day.

Talk to an expert
Talk to an expert

We reply within one business day

By sending this form you agree that we process your details to answer your enquiry; see our privacy policy.

request@eurokommerz.at
Jordangasse 7, 1010 Vienna